Cannabis in an oncology context, read from the published record rather than from testimonials. What the evidence actually supports, which is mostly symptom management, and where the widely repeated claims about treating the disease itself come from.
The distinction that governs every thread here is between palliative use and antitumour claims. Controlled evidence exists for nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy and, less consistently, for appetite and pain; the laboratory work showing cannabinoids killing cancer cells in culture or in animals has not translated into clinical proof of benefit in people, and saying so is not a judgment about anyone’s decision.
Two things this sub-board cannot do. It cannot give medical advice or replace an oncology team, particularly where an interaction with an existing treatment is possible. And Thai law puts a real boundary on what may be posted: only the flower is a controlled herb under the Notification of the Ministry of Public Health Re: Controlled Herbs (Cannabis), B.E. 2568, advertising cannabis is prohibited and so is selling it online, so a product recommendation is not a permissible answer here.
Where to start
Related elsewhere on the forum: Rick Simpson Oil: Where the Claims Came From in Extraction and Concentrates.